[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHA+R7NHRaLtzBJd_Sc6_aNLMs=iGHTBK8j9Bq0ntCDg-meLZg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 15:39:27 -0700
From: Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>,
Dave Taht <dave.taht@...il.com>, toke@...e.dk
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next PATCH V3 0/2] qdisc bulk dequeuing and utilizing
delayed tailptr updates
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-09-19 at 23:31 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>
>> How can I test if the dev supports BQL?
>
>
> CONFIG_BQL should be enough.
Then why commits like this one?
commit 7070ce0a6419a118842298bc967061ad6cea40db
Author: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
Date: Sat Sep 28 06:00:37 2013 +0000
i40e: Add support for Tx byte queue limits
Implement BQL (byte queue limit) support in i40e.
>
> If a device driver do nothing about BQL, byte_queue_limits/limit will be
> zero by default.
Also note that for some virtual device, BQL may make no sense at all,
at least veth doesn't even use a TX queue (I know it has tx-0 mostly for
qdisc). Perhaps all NETIF_F_LLTX ones?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists