netdev - Re: [net-next PATCH 28/29] fm10k: Add support for ptp to hw specific files

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <541C4D16.9050603@intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 19 Sep 2014 08:34:46 -0700
From:	Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
To:	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
CC:	davem@...emloft.net, nhorman@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	john.fastabend@...il.com, matthew.vick@...el.com,
	jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, sassmann@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 28/29] fm10k: Add support for ptp to hw specific
 files

On 09/19/2014 08:19 AM, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 07:36:56AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> On 09/19/2014 12:38 AM, Richard Cochran wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 06:40:30PM -0400, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>>>
>>>> +static s32 fm10k_adjust_systime_pf(struct fm10k_hw *hw, s32 ppb)
>>>> +{
>>>> +	u64 systime_adjust;
>>>> +
>>>> +	/* if sw_addr is not set we don't have switch register access */
>>>> +	if (!hw->sw_addr)
>>>> +		return ppb ? FM10K_ERR_PARAM : 0;
>>>> +
>>>> +	/* we must convert the value from parts per billion to parts per
>>>> +	 * 2^48 cycles.  In addition we can only use the upper 30 bits of
>>>> +	 * the value when making the change so that restricts us futher.
>>>> +	 * The math for this is equivilent to ABS(pps) * 2^40 / 10 ^ 9,
> 
> ...
> 
>> 2.  The value is in 2 ^ 48 units, and the OS wants to give us a value in
>> parts per billion, not parts per 256 * 2 ^ 40.  So in order to simplify
>> things I dropped the lower 8 bits and only update
> 
> So what does the comment in the code about "upper 30 bits" mean?
> 

The value is measured in parts per 2^48 units, but the field we are
given to provide adjustment units is 38 bits wide, with the 30 most
significant bits in the main adjustment register, and the 8 least
significant bits in another register.  The direction is a separate bit
at bit 31 in the upper register with a 1 bit gap between it and the value.

Thanks,

Alex

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html