[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1411242956.26859.81.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 12:55:56 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: avoid possible arithmetic overflows
On Sat, 2014-09-20 at 12:46 -0700, Yuchung Cheng wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2014-09-20 at 10:19 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> >>
> >> icsk_rto is an 32bit field, and icsk_backoff can reach 15 by default,
> >> or more if some sysctl (eg tcp_retries2) are changed.
> >>
> >> Better use 64bit to perform icsk_rto << icsk_backoff operations
> >
> > Maybe better to use a helper function for this?
> >
> > something like:
> >
> > static inline u64 icsk_rto_backoff(const struct inet_connection_sock *icsk)
> > {
> > u64 when = (u64)icsk->icsk_rto;
> >
> > return when << icsk->icsk_backoff;
> > }
> Thanks for the fix Eric. I second Joe's idea to use a helper function.
>
Yep.
Given the timeout functions in the kernel use 'unsigned long', I prefer
to keep the u64 magic private to this helper.
I will probably use
static inline unsigned long icsk_rto_backoff(const struct inet_connection_sock *icsk)
{
u64 when = (u64)icsk->icsk_rto << icsk->icsk_backoff;
return min_t(u64, when, ~0UL);
}
On 64bit arches, the min_t() should be a nop.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists