[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <541E3640.6020907@yoshifuji.org>
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 11:21:52 +0900
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <hideaki@...hifuji.org>
To: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
CC: eric.dumazet@...il.com, vyasevich@...il.com,
nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, kafai@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/8] ipv6: new function fib6_flush_trees and
use it instead of bumping removed rt6_genid
Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> fib6_flush_trees is still a very costly operation but now is only called
> by xfrm code when a policy changes or ipv6 addresses are added/removed.
>
> fib6_flush_tree must walk all ipv6 routing tables and modify fn_sernum,
> so all sockets relookup their dst_entries. Use a NULL callback, so we
> only walk the nodes without looking at the rt6_infos.
>
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Cc: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>
> Cc: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
> Cc: Martin Lau <kafai@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
> ---
> include/net/net_namespace.h | 14 +++-----------
> include/net/netns/ipv6.h | 1 -
> net/ipv6/addrconf_core.c | 6 ++++++
> net/ipv6/af_inet6.c | 1 -
> net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
> net/ipv6/route.c | 4 ----
> 6 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/net_namespace.h b/include/net/net_namespace.h
> index 361d260..61aad36 100644
> --- a/include/net/net_namespace.h
> +++ b/include/net/net_namespace.h
> @@ -353,21 +353,13 @@ static inline void rt_genid_bump_ipv4(struct net *net)
> }
>
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> -static inline int rt_genid_ipv6(struct net *net)
> -{
> - return atomic_read(&net->ipv6.rt_genid);
> -}
> -
> +extern void (*__fib6_flush_trees)(struct net *);
> static inline void rt_genid_bump_ipv6(struct net *net)
> {
> - atomic_inc(&net->ipv6.rt_genid);
> + if (__fib6_flush_trees)
> + __fib6_flush_trees(net);
> }
> #else
Now it does not "bump" the genid anymore. Why not to change the
function name to reflect the fact?
--yoshfuji
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists