netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH linux-next] et131x: Promote staging et131x driver to drivers/net

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140923190242.GA8096@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>
Date:	Tue, 23 Sep 2014 21:02:42 +0200
From:	Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
To:	Mark Einon <mark.einon@...il.com>
Cc:	Tobias Klauser <tklauser@...tanz.ch>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	davem@...emloft.net, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH linux-next] et131x: Promote staging et131x driver to
 drivers/net

Mark Einon <mark.einon@...il.com> :
[...]
> > No need for the #define here, just assigne et131x_pm_ops to .driver.pm
> > directly, its members will be NULL and thus never called. Also, you can
> > make et131x_pm_ops const.
> 
> Ok, I can change this.
> 
> Btw, this appears to be a fairly standard way of using .driver.pm among
> ethernet drivers, e.g. see 3com/3c59x.c, atheros, marvell... - perhaps
> there is a case for changing all instances of this code?

How about kernel tinification ?

-- 
Ueimor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html