netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] tcp: better TCP_SKB_CB layout to reduce cache line misses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:20:16 +0200
From:	Christoph Paasch <christoph.paasch@...ouvain.be>
To:	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>,
	Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] tcp: better TCP_SKB_CB layout to reduce
 cache line misses

Hello Eric,

On 22/09/14 - 16:50:44, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> TCP maintains lists of skb in write queue, and in receive queues
> (in order and out of order queues)
> 
> Scanning these lists both in input and output path usually requires
> access to skb->next, TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq, and TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq
> 
> These fields are currently in two different cache lines, meaning we
> waste lot of memory bandwidth when these queues are big and flows
> have either packet drops or packet reorders.
> 
> We can move TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->header at the end of TCP_SKB_CB, because
> this header is not used in fast path. This allows TCP to search much faster
> in the skb lists.
> 
> Even with regular flows, we save one cache line miss in fast path.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> ---
>  include/net/tcp.h   | 12 ++++++------
>  net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c |  7 +++++++
>  net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c |  7 +++++++
>  3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

doesn't also the tx-path relies on IPCB(skb) being memset to 0 (e.g., in
xfrm4_output or ip_options_build)

Or is it somewhere already explicitly memset to 0? (didn't found this place
in the code though)


Cheers,
Christoph

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html