[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54240F34.1050707@mojatatu.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 08:48:52 -0400
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
CC: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
therbert@...gle.com, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>, toke@...e.dk,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Dave Taht <dave.taht@...il.com>,
John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 1/1 V4] qdisc: bulk dequeue support for qdiscs
with TCQ_F_ONETXQUEUE
On 09/25/14 04:25, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 18:13:57 -0400
> I've done measurements with netperf-wrapper:
> http://netoptimizer.blogspot.dk/2014/09/mini-tutorial-for-netperf-wrapper-setup.html
>
> I have already previously posted my measurements here:
> http://people.netfilter.org/hawk/qdisc/
> http://people.netfilter.org/hawk/qdisc/measure01/
> http://people.netfilter.org/hawk/qdisc/experiment01/
>
Theres a lot of data there to digest; all good looking.
I will try to pay attention to detail and get back to you.
What you have on those urls is fit for a paper, but what someone
like me (with ADD) needs is a summary somewhere maybe in the commit
logs.
> Please, see my previous mail where I described each graph.
>
Is this patch 0?
I think a simple statement in the commit log that no cats
were harmed ^W^W^W performance was affected. A paragraph
at most but if you want to do more, DaveM actually has no
problems if you write the details of a novel in patch 0.
cheers,
jamal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists