[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140925154844.GM5044@cpaasch-mac>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 17:48:44 +0200
From: Christoph Paasch <christoph.paasch@...ouvain.be>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 3/3] tcp: better TCP_SKB_CB layout to reduce
cache line misses
On 23/09/14 - 03:34:12, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> TCP maintains lists of skb in write queue, and in receive queues
> (in order and out of order queues)
>
> Scanning these lists both in input and output path usually requires
> access to skb->next, TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq, and TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq
>
> These fields are currently in two different cache lines, meaning we
> waste lot of memory bandwidth when these queues are big and flows
> have either packet drops or packet reorders.
>
> We can move TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->header at the end of TCP_SKB_CB, because
> this header is not used in fast path. This allows TCP to search much faster
> in the skb lists.
>
> Even with regular flows, we save one cache line miss in fast path.
>
> Thanks to Christoph Paasch for noticing we need to cleanup
> skb->cb[] (IPCB/IP6CB) before entering IP stack in tx path.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> ---
> include/net/tcp.h | 12 ++++++------
> net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 7 +++++++
> net/ipv4/tcp_output.c | 5 +++++
> net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c | 7 +++++++
> 4 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Hello Eric,
I think that in tcp_v4_hnd_req() and tcp_v4_save_options() we also need to
avoid calling IPCB() and do TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->header.h4.opt instead.
Cheers,
Christoph
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists