[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1411718323.1731596.171980125.03C65719@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 09:58:43 +0200
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
hideaki@...hifuji.org, vyasevich@...il.com,
nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, kafai@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/9] ipv6: fib6: socket dst_entry improvments and
cleanups
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014, at 06:28, David Miller wrote:
> From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
> Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 16:11:44 +0200
>
> > Eric Dumazet noticed that rt6_nodes wich are neither RTF_NONEXTHOP nor
> > RTF_GATEWAY but DST_HOST ones cause major routing lookup churn because
> > their rt6_genid is never renewed, thus ip6_dst_check always considers
> > them outdated. This is a major problem, because these kind of routes
> > are normally used to in input handling.
>
> This series is a disappointment for me from the perspective of the
> fact that we have a regression in mainline and this is too complex
> of a set of changes for there.
>
> If we relookup the thing every TCP input packet, we might as well
> not do the input route caching in the socket.
I can understand.
Toss this series, I'll try to do better tomorrow and send changes for
net and submit net-next cleanups when your queue is a bit smaller.
Bye,
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists