netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: reorganize sk_buff for faster __copy_skb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 28 Sep 2014 17:37:59 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, amirv@...lanox.com,
	john.r.fastabend@...el.com, brouer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: reorganize sk_buff for faster
 __copy_skb_header()

From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 14:20:04 -0700

> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> 
> With proliferation of bit fields in sk_buff, __copy_skb_header() became
> quite expensive, showing as the most expensive function in a GSO
> workload.
> 
> __copy_skb_header() performance is also critical for non GSO TCP
> operations, as it is used from skb_clone()
> 
> This patch carefully moves all the fields that were not copied in a
> separate zone : cloned, nohdr, fclone, peeked, head_frag, xmit_more
> 
> Then I moved all other fields and all other copied fields in a section
> delimited by headers_start[0]/headers_end[0] section so that we
> can use a single memcpy() call, inlined by compiler using long
> word load/stores.
> 
> I also tried to make all copies in the natural orders of sk_buff,
> to help hardware prefetching.
> 
> I made sure sk_buff size did not change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>

Applied, thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html