[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+mtBx-fVX33qOJewe2wS=77m-q+YtfnPStFX=2CWf7c7HrQdw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 08:05:48 -0700
From: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>,
Dave Taht <dave.taht@...il.com>,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...e.dk>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH] dql: add a burst attribute
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 7:49 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 07:26 -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
>
>
>> Yes, this is the wrong place to put it. DQL knows nothing about
>> packets or technically even bytes, it's a generic library that deal
>> with "objects" on a queue. I don't see how burst relates to this.
>
> I wonder then why you put :
>
> netdev_tx_completed_queue(struct netdev_queue *dev_queue,
> unsigned int pkts, unsigned int bytes)
>
In case we ever wanted to count by packets instead of or in addition to bytes.
> Really, I don't care _where_ the attribute is, as long we dont access
> yet another cache line in fast path.
Just put it after/before dql in netdev_queue structure.
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists