netdev - Philosophical question: Is a UDP multicast datagram for which there is no socket match a drop or an ignore?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <542B3831.5030701@hp.com>
Date:	Tue, 30 Sep 2014 16:09:37 -0700
From:	Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Philosophical question:  Is a UDP multicast datagram for which there
 is no socket match a drop or an ignore?

I've been looking at some additional perf <mutter> -e skb_kfree_skb 
results, this time with a laptop connected to a corporate network with a 
large number of Windows systems sending out what they are wont to 
send...  The laptop is just sitting there no active netperfs or anything :)

I see profile hits for __udp4_lib_mcast_deliver() which has a 
kfree_skb() call which will happen if either there were no sockets 
found, or if an integral multiple of ARRAY_SIZE(stack) sockets are 
found.  I'm assuming the latter is exceedingly rare.

Anywho, the philosophical question - is such a situation a drop 
(indicating the existing kfree_skb()), or is it an ignore (indicating a 
consume_skb())?  Should there be a statistic incremented for either of 
those?

happy benchmarking,

rick jones
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html