netdev - Re: [net-next PATCH V5] qdisc: bulk dequeue support for qdiscs with TCQ_F

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140930122509.GF11709@breakpoint.cc>
Date:	Tue, 30 Sep 2014 14:25:09 +0200
From:	Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
	Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
	Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>,
	Dave Taht <dave.taht@...il.com>, toke@...e.dk
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH V5] qdisc: bulk dequeue support for qdiscs with
 TCQ_F_ONETXQUEUE

Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> >  	struct sk_buff *skb = q->gso_skb;
> > @@ -70,10 +106,17 @@ static inline struct sk_buff *dequeue_skb(struct Qdisc *q)
> >  		} else
> >  			skb = NULL;
> >  	} else {
> > -		if (!(q->flags & TCQ_F_ONETXQUEUE) || !netif_xmit_frozen_or_stopped(txq)) {
> > +		if (!(q->flags & TCQ_F_ONETXQUEUE) ||
> > +		    !netif_xmit_frozen_or_stopped(txq)) {
> > +			int bytelimit = qdisc_avail_bulklimit(txq);
> > +
> >  			skb = q->dequeue(q);
> > -			if (skb)
> > +			if (skb) {
> > +				bytelimit -= skb->len;
> >  				skb = validate_xmit_skb(skb, qdisc_dev(q));
> > +			}
> > +			if (skb && qdisc_may_bulk(q))
> > +				skb = try_bulk_dequeue_skb(q, skb, bytelimit);
> >  		}
> >  	}
> 
> Okay...
> 
> In my opinion, you guys missed some opportunities :
> 
> 1) Ideally the algo should try to call validate_xmit_skb() outside of
> the locks (qdisc lock or device lock), because eventually doing checksum
> computation or full segmentation should allow other cpus doing enqueues.

You're right, but this is not related to this patch specifically.
But sure, we can look into moving validate_xmit_skb calls outside of the
qdisc root locked sections.

> 2) TSO support. Have you ideas how to perform this ?

Yes, the idea was to just remove the skb_is_gso() test and limit
dql_avail() result to e.g. 128k to avoid a '8-fat-gso-skbs-in-a-row' scenario.

Did you have any other ideas in mind?

Thanks,
Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html