[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141001202454.GO17706@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 16:24:54 -0400
From: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net, raghuram.kothakota@...cle.com,
sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com, david.stevens@...cle.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next 0/2] sunvnet: Packet processing in non-interrupt
context
The existing sunvnet implementation does all the packet interception
in LDC interrupt context. Patch 1 of this series moves the data
processing to a bottom-half handler.
Some context for the reasons for choosing a BH handler over NAPI:
A NAPI (or simple tasklet) based implementation provides softirq
context, which allows the driver to safely invoke netif_receive_skb()
to deliver the packet to the IP stack. But in the case of sunvnet,
we are already receiving multiple packets for a single ldc_rx
interrupt, so the budget-based softirq-vs-polling infra does not
provide a significant optimization. Rather, it can get in the way,
if we constrain the vnet-rx path to a poorly chosen budget, and force
ourselves to send a STOPPED/START ldc exchange needlessly.
A BH Rx handler is a simpler way to avoid the weaknesses of processing
packets in LDC interrupt context, and also provides Rx load-spreading
across multiple CPUs.
Note that PATCH 1 is dependant on the functions added as part of the
sparc-next commit "sparc64: Add vio_set_intr() to enable/disable Rx interrupts"
(Cf: http://www.spinics.net/lists/sparclinux/msg12647.html)
PATCH 2 of this series fixes a race-condition between vnet_port_remove()
and vnet_start_xmit().
changes since v1 to Patch 2: revert switch_port caching in struct vnet
Sowmini Varadhan (2):
Process Rx data packets in a BH handler
vnet_start_xmit() must hold a refcnt on port.
drivers/net/ethernet/sun/sunvnet.c | 187 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
drivers/net/ethernet/sun/sunvnet.h | 12 ++-
2 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
--
1.8.4.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists