netdev - netlink NETLINK_ROUTE failure & Can the kernel really handle IPv6 properly

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <542C63FE.9080807@emagii.com>
Date:	Wed, 01 Oct 2014 22:28:46 +0200
From:	Ulf Samuelsson <netdev@...gii.com>
To:	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: netlink NETLINK_ROUTE  failure & Can the kernel really handle IPv6
 properly

Trying to write a kernel module handing NETLINK_ROUTE messages for a 
3.4.x kernel.

After building the module, it fails to load on my PowerPC P2020 target.
Reason is that the "netlink_kernel_create" fails.

---------------------------------------
struct *sock    nls;

...
static int __init my_init (...)
{
     ...
     nls = netlink_kernel_create( &init_net, NETLINK_ROUTE, 0, my_rcv, 
NULL, THIS_MODULE);
     if (!nls) {
             return -ENOMEM;
     }
...
}
----------------------------------------
netlick_kernel_create returns 0, so the kernel module fails.

Is there anything wrong wth the call to netlink_kernel_create ?

Goggling show that some code uses "__net_init".
Not sure what that means.

Other code uses a mutex, instead of NULL.
Does NETLINK_ROUTE require a mutex?

All ideas are welcome-

==============
BTW, the problem I am trying to solve is how to connect to an I/F with 
an IPv6 link-local address.

An existing kernel module waits for a NETDEV_UP event, and then tries to 
communicate
with the link-local address.

This will fail, because (according to a colleague) the I/F enters a 
"tentative" state,
where it is trying to decide if it is unique or not.
It will remain in that state for 1-2 seconds, and only afterwards is the 
link-local address
available for normal use.

The guys writing the module, claim that the kernel is using NETDEV_UP.
There is very little code in the kernel using NETLINK_ROUTE, even in 
latest stable.
It is using NETDEV_UP.

If my colleague is right, the kernel really cannot handle IPv6 
link-local addresses properly.

-- 
Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html