[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <542BA528.3040908@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 15:54:32 +0900
From: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>
To: Vladislav Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
CC: toshiaki.makita1@...il.com, stephen@...workplumber.org,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Vladislav Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net 3/3] bridge: Add filtering support for default_pvid
On 2014/10/01 4:31, Vladislav Yasevich wrote:
> Currently when vlan filtering is turned on on the bridge, the bridge
> will drop all traffic untill the user configures the filter. This
> isn't very nice for ports that don't care about vlans and just
> want untagged traffic.
>
> A concept of a default_pvid was recently introduced. This patch
> adds filtering support for default_pvid. Now, ports that don't
> care about vlans and don't define there own filter will belong
> to the VLAN of the default_pvid and continue to receive untagged
> traffic.
>
> This filtering can be disabled by setting default_pvid to 0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladislav Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>
> ---
...
> @@ -500,6 +500,8 @@ int br_add_if(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_device *dev)
> if (br_fdb_insert(br, p, dev->dev_addr, 0))
> netdev_err(dev, "failed insert local address bridge forwarding table\n");
>
> + nbp_vlan_init(p);
> +
The return value of nbp_vlan_init() is not handled.
How about logging in the same way as fdb-inserting?
> spin_lock_bh(&br->lock);
> changed_addr = br_stp_recalculate_bridge_id(br);
>
...
> +static void br_vlan_disable_default_pvid(struct net_bridge *br)
> +{
> + struct net_bridge_port *p;
> + unsigned short pvid = br->default_pvid;
u16 will be better than "unsigned short".
> +
> + /* This function runs under RTNL with vlan filter disabled.
> + * It is safe to directly access rcu pointers.
Is this OK with sparse?
(This isn't the same case as commit f9586f79bf61 "vlan: add
rtnl_dereference() annotations"?)
> + *
> + * Disable default_pvid on all ports where it is still
> + * configured.
> + */
> + if (pvid == br_get_pvid(br_get_vlan_info(br)) &&
> + test_bit(pvid, br->vlan_info->untagged_bitmap))
> + br_vlan_delete(br, pvid);
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(p, &br->port_list, list) {
> + if (pvid == br_get_pvid(nbp_get_vlan_info(p)) &&
> + test_bit(pvid, p->vlan_info->untagged_bitmap))
> + nbp_vlan_delete(p, pvid);
> + }
> +
> + br->default_pvid = 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int __br_vlan_set_default_pvid(struct net_bridge *br, u16 pvid)
> +{
> + struct net_bridge_port *p;
> + u16 old_pvid;
> + int err;
> + DECLARE_BITMAP(changed, BR_MAX_PORTS);
> +
> + bitmap_zero(changed, BR_MAX_PORTS);
> +
> + /* This function runs with filtering turned off so we can
> + * remove the old pvid configuration and add the new one after
> + * without impacting traffic.
> + */
> +
> + old_pvid = br->default_pvid;
> +
> + /* If the user has set a different PVID or if the new default pvid
> + * conflicts with user configuration, do not modify the configuration.
> + */
> + if (old_pvid != br_get_pvid(br_get_vlan_info(br)) ||
> + br_vlan_find(br, pvid))
> + goto do_ports;
Should check untagged_bitmap for old_pvid as well?
> +
> + set_bit(0, changed);
> + br_vlan_delete(br, old_pvid);
> + err = br_vlan_add(br, pvid,
> + BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO_PVID | BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO_UNTAGGED);
br_vlan_add() should be done before br_vlan_delete()?
br_vlan_delete() might free vlan_info which will be immediately
allocated by following br_vlan_add().
Thanks,
Toshiaki Makita
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists