netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] mlx4: optimize xmit path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <542D48E3.2090403@mellanox.com>
Date:	Thu, 2 Oct 2014 15:45:23 +0300
From:	Amir Vadai <amirv@...lanox.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC:	Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Or Gerlitz" <or.gerlitz@...il.com>, <amira@...lanox.com>,
	<idos@...lanox.com>, Yevgeny Petrilin <yevgenyp@...lanox.com>,
	<eyalpe@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] mlx4: optimize xmit path

On 10/2/2014 3:07 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-10-02 at 14:56 +0300, Amir Vadai wrote:
>> After making sure the sender thread and the TX completions are not on
>> the same CPU, I see the expected improvement. +0.5Mpps with tx
>> optimizations.
> 
> I got 40% here.
> 
> Hmm... both cpus are on the same socket, right ?
Yes. And on a NUMA node close to the NIC

> 
> TX coalescing is properly setup ?
I will try to play with it, if it is too aggressive, the queue is stopped.
I will play again with it and the ring size to find a better spot.

> 
> What interrupt rate do you get ?
~50K per second.

> 
> You can take a look at where cycles are spent
> 
> perf record -a -g sleep 5
> perf report
> 
> 
I will.

In case your curious, I have this on the CPU doing completions:
+  44.86%      swapper  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] consume_skb
+  21.38%      swapper  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] mlx4_en_poll_tx_cq
+   6.81%      swapper  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] mlx4_en_free_tx_desc.isra.24
+   6.07%      swapper  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] intel_idle
+   2.98%      swapper  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] __dev_kfree_skb_any
+   2.66%         rngd  rngd               [.] 0x0000000000002749
+   1.79%         rngd  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] consume_skb
+   1.28%      swapper  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] irq_entries_start
+   1.16%         rngd  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] mlx4_en_poll_tx_cq
+   0.86%      swapper  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] swiotlb_unmap_page
+   0.79%      swapper  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] unmap_single
+   0.63%      swapper  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] irqtime_account_irq
+   0.55%      swapper  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] mlx4_eq_int
+   0.51%      swapper  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] eq_set_ci.isra.14

and this on the xmit thread:
+  72.00%  kpktgend_6  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] mlx4_en_xmit
+  13.11%  kpktgend_6  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] pktgen_thread_worker
+   5.34%  kpktgend_6  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] _raw_spin_lock
+   3.80%  kpktgend_6  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] swiotlb_map_page
+   2.08%  kpktgend_6  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] __iowrite64_copy
+   1.21%  kpktgend_6  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] skb_clone_tx_timestamp
+   0.87%  kpktgend_6  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] kthread_should_stop
+   0.64%  kpktgend_6  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] swiotlb_dma_mapping_error
+   0.51%  kpktgend_6  [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] __local_bh_enable_ip

Thanks,
Amir

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html