netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v6 2/2] bonding: Simplify the xmit function for modes that use xmit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAF2d9jgj-nMnXD2V++Ug5UmkoCpa_EtMrqYnaSCb6Ncq-vezQA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 2 Oct 2014 22:49:54 +0530
From:	Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
To:	Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
Cc:	Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>,
	Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>,
	Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Maciej Zenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 2/2] bonding: Simplify the xmit function for
 modes that use xmit_hash

On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 1:38 AM, Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com> wrote:
>> +int bond_update_slave_arr(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *skipslave)
>> +{
>> +       struct slave *slave;
>> +       struct list_head *iter;
>> +       struct bond_up_slave *new_arr, *old_arr;
>> +       int slaves_in_agg;
>> +       int agg_id = 0;
>> +       int ret = 0;
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
>> +       WARN_ON(lockdep_is_held(&bond->mode_lock));
>> +#endif
>
>
> I think you can use lockdep_is_held().
>
>> +
>> +       new_arr = kzalloc(offsetof(struct bond_up_slave, arr[bond->slave_cnt]),
>> +                         GFP_KERNEL);
>> +       if (!new_arr) {
>> +               ret = -ENOMEM;
>> +               pr_err("Failed to build slave-array.\n");
>> +               goto out;
>> +       }
>
>
> No need to print an error message for OOM, it is already noisy. :)
>
Agreed OOM condition is noisy but failing silently would not help
debugging hence adding the message.
>
>> +       if (BOND_MODE(bond) == BOND_MODE_8023AD) {
>> +               struct ad_info ad_info;
>> +
>> +               if (bond_3ad_get_active_agg_info(bond, &ad_info)) {
>> +                       pr_debug("bond_3ad_get_active_agg_info failed\n");
>
>
> I suspect how useful this debug info is since your patch is almost ready
> to merge.
>
It could be useful for someone else too :)

>> +                       kfree_rcu(new_arr, rcu);
>> +                       /* No active aggragator means its not safe to use
>
> s/its/it's/
>
thanks

>> +                        * the previous array.
>> +                        */
>> +                       old_arr = rtnl_dereference(bond->slave_arr);
>> +                       if (old_arr) {
>> +                               RCU_INIT_POINTER(bond->slave_arr, NULL);
>> +                               kfree_rcu(old_arr, rcu);
>> +                       }
>> +                       goto out;
>> +               }
>> +               slaves_in_agg = ad_info.ports;
>> +               agg_id = ad_info.aggregator_id;
>> +       }
>
>
>
> Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html