netdev - Bridge IGMP snooping question

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <542D0911.3040402@rockbox.org>
Date:	Thu, 02 Oct 2014 10:13:05 +0200
From:	Thomas Martitz <kugel@...kbox.org>
To:	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Bridge IGMP snooping question

Hello Linux folks,

I have one question regarding IGMP snooping on bridges, specifically 
about leaving multicast groups.

br_multicast_leave_group() has this check early on:

if (!netif_running(br->dev) ||
         (port && port->state == BR_STATE_DISABLED) ||
         timer_pending(&querier->timer)) /* <- THIS */
                goto out;

I'm wondering why the bridge code prevents group leaves if if the 
querier timer is pending. From my understanding the timer acts as an 
indication whether the local system is the network's querier or not (if 
pending then another router is querier). Therefore this check prevents 
to leave groups if there is another querier.

I'm wondering what's the rationale for this, if any. It seems to be that 
the decision whether an attached client gets mc forwarded is independent 
on whether the local system is querier or not. Git log does not reveal 
the answer as this check is there from the beginning.

PS: This behavior conflicts with something I'm working.

Thank you very much in advance.

Best regards.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html