[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+mtBx_TQhbS3VPVKjosaQjyO8YkNi=zBQMVYEbLqR8Hyczd3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 15:19:24 -0700
From: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>,
Dave Taht <dave.taht@...il.com>,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...e.dk>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH V6 0/2] qdisc: bulk dequeue support
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 14:57 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 14:56 -0700, David Miller wrote:
>>
>> > I completely agree, and I sort of intended this to happen when
>> > I split all the code into that new function.
>> >
>> > GSO segmentation of TX checksuming should not prevent other
>> > > cpus from queueing other skbs in the qdisc.
>> > >
>> > > I will spend some time on this.
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>>
>> I just did my first reboot, will make sure everything is working well
>> before sending the patch ;)
>
> This is awesome...
>
> 40Gb rate, with TSO=on or TSO=off, it does not matter anymore.
>
This is with or without GSO?
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists