netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] qdisc: validate skb without holding lock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1412379044.17245.26.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:	Fri, 03 Oct 2014 16:30:44 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	brouer@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, therbert@...gle.com,
	hannes@...essinduktion.org, fw@...len.de, dborkman@...hat.com,
	jhs@...atatu.com, alexander.duyck@...il.com,
	john.r.fastabend@...el.com, dave.taht@...il.com, toke@...e.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] qdisc: validate skb without holding lock

On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 15:36 -0700, David Miller wrote:

> Applied, thanks Eric!

Thanks David

Another problem we need to address is the quota in __qdisc_run()
is no longer meaningfull, if each qdisc_restart() can pump many packets.

An idea would be to use the bstats (or cpu_qstats if applicable)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html