netdev - Re: macvlan: optimizing the receive path?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <542ECBD7.7030807@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 03 Oct 2014 12:16:23 -0400
From:	Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>
To:	Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
CC:	kaber@...sh.net
Subject: Re: macvlan: optimizing the receive path?

On 10/02/2014 04:28 PM, Jason Baron wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I was just wondering why the netif_rx(skb) call in macvlan_handle_frame()
> was necessary? IE:
> 
> macvlan_handle_frame()
> {
>        ........
> 
>         skb->dev = dev;
>         skb->pkt_type = PACKET_HOST;
> 
> ****>ret = netif_rx(skb);
> 
> out:
>         macvlan_count_rx(vlan, len, ret == NET_RX_SUCCESS, 0);
>         return RX_HANDLER_CONSUMED;
> }
> 
> 
> I think the point of going through netif_rx() is to ensure that we throttle
> incoming packets, but hasn't that already been accomplished in this path?
> That is if the packets are arriving from the physical NIC, we've already
> throttled them by this point. Otherwise, if they are coming via
> macvlan_queue_xmit(), it calls either 'dev_forward_skb()', which ends
> up calling netif_rx_internal(), or else in broadcast mode there is
> to be throttling via macvlan_broadcast_enqueue().
> 
> So I suspect there is a code path that I am missing but the netif_rx() call in
> question essentially re-queues packets coming from off the box. I've tried the
> simple patch below to optimize this path, and obviously performs a lot better
> in my limited testing.

Hi Jason

I think the patch below is fine and in this particular case, it's OK to do this.

-vlad

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -Jason
> 
> --- a/drivers/net/macvlan.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/macvlan.c
> @@ -321,8 +321,8 @@ static rx_handler_result_t macvlan_handle_frame(struct sk_buff **pskb)
>         skb->dev = dev;
>         skb->pkt_type = PACKET_HOST;
>  
> -       ret = netif_rx(skb);
> -
> +      macvlan_count_rx(vlan, len, true, 0);
> +      return RX_HANDLER_ANOTHER;
>  out:
>         macvlan_count_rx(vlan, len, ret == NET_RX_SUCCESS, 0);
>         return RX_HANDLER_CONSUMED;
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html