[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141004135508.GA10705@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2014 21:55:08 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, bsd@...hat.com,
stephen@...workplumber.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, davidn@...idnewall.com,
Bandan Das <bandan.das@...atus.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf next 0/3] bridge: netfilter: fix handling of ipv4
packets w. options
On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 12:04:13PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
>
> > The reason I asked for the IPCB to be built is to handle exactly
> > that case.
>
> Why do we need to compile ip options, exactly? If the packet
> is locally delivered, we hand it up to the ip stack which will
> compile ip options normally.
Good point. I thought we added this because Bandan Das wanted
options. But rereading the thread in question
http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/9/3/16
it seems that he doesn't actually need options. So what happened
appears to be a misunderstanding. Bandan tried to improve my
original memset hack by compiling options which would have been
fine except that his approach ended up mangling the packet which
is a big no-no.
So the most straightforward solution is to go back to my original
hack and just do a straight memset zero of the cb area before
each entry into the IP stack from the bridge.
I'll try to create a patch that essentially reverts the patch
that led us here.
Cheers,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists