netdev - Re: bridge: Respect call-iptables sysctls everywhere

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 5 Oct 2014 11:13:43 +0200
From:	Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:	Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	bsd@...hat.com, stephen@...workplumber.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	eric.dumazet@...il.com, davidn@...idnewall.com,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: bridge: Respect call-iptables sysctls everywhere

Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 08:06:47PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> >
> > Fair enough.  We lose frag_max_size information from ipv4 defrag,
> 
> While reviewing this code it occured to me that we have a serious
> bug in that call-iptables sysctls aren't even respected in FORWARD
> and POST_ROUTING.  Here is a patch that fixes this.

Upcalls to iptables in FORWARD/POSTROUTING depend on skb->nf_bridge
being set up, which only happens when call-iptables=1.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html