lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2014 12:11:13 -0400 From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...atus.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> Subject: Re: [PATCH] team: add rescheduling jiffy delay on !rtnl_trylock Hello, Paul, Joe. On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 07:08:55AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > I wasn't sure if cond_resched_rcu_qs will be backported, so how should > > -stable handle this condition? > > If it is needed to backport a fix, it can of course be backported. > The various -stable maintainers also have the option of avoiding > the need for a backport by expanding it inline. I am happy to let > them choose. ;-) Let's go for separate cond_resched + rcu_qs calls first and then apply a separate patch to use cond_resched_rcu_qs() so that the first one can be marked for -stable. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists