netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: Add ndo_gso

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+mtBx8-w74f_f9JEfpwH9=Mjr_zaJJAYCMMdYAWdCy-51pzqg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 5 Oct 2014 11:49:05 -0700
From:	Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
To:	Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>
Cc:	Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>,
	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
	Pravin Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>,
	Andy Zhou <azhou@...ira.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Add ndo_gso_check

On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 2:06 AM, Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com> wrote:
> [...]
>> Solution #4: apply this patch and implement the check functions as
>> needed in those 4 or 5 drivers. If a device can only do VXLAN/NVGRE
>> then I believe the check function is something like:
>>
>> bool mydev_gso_check(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
>> {
>>         if ((skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type & SKB_GSO_UDP_TUNNEL) &&
>>             ((skb->inner_protocol_type != ENCAP_TYPE_ETHER ||
>>               skb->protocol != htons(ETH_P_TEB) ||
>>               skb_inner_mac_header(skb) - skb_transport_header(skb) != 12)
>>                 return false;
>>
>>         return true;
>> }
>
> Yep, such helper can can be basically made to work and let the 4-5
> drivers that can
> do GSO offloading for vxlan but not for any FOU/GUE packets signal
> that to the stack.
>
> Re the 12 constant, you were referring to the udp+vxlan headers? it's 8+8
>
> Also, we need a way for drivers that can support VXLAN or NVGRE but
> not concurrently
> on the same port @ the same time to only let vxlan packet to pass
> successfully through the helper.
>
Or, there should be no difference in GSO processing between VXLAN and
NVGRE. Can you explain why you feel you need to differentiate them for
GSO?

Thanks,
Tom

> There was that coloring scheme I suggested, but you didn't like it...
>
>>>> Would any other driver maintainers like to chime in on this?
>>> Alex? John?
>
>
> Or.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html