netdev - Re: [PATCH v8 net-next 2/2] bonding: Simplify the xmit function for modes that use xmit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20141006.171343.562229383265827215.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 06 Oct 2014 17:13:43 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	maheshb@...gle.com
Cc:	j.vosburgh@...il.com, andy@...yhouse.net, vfalico@...il.com,
	nikolay@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
	maze@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 net-next 2/2] bonding: Simplify the xmit function
 for modes that use xmit_hash

From: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
Date: Sat,  4 Oct 2014 17:45:01 -0700

> Earlier change to use usable slave array for TLB mode had an additional
> performance advantage. So extending the same logic to all other modes
> that use xmit-hash for slave selection (viz 802.3AD, and XOR modes).
> Also consolidating this with the earlier TLB change.
> 
> The main idea is to build the usable slaves array in the control path
> and use that array for slave selection during xmit operation.
> 
> Measured performance in a setup with a bond of 4x1G NICs with 200
> instances of netperf for the modes involved (3ad, xor, tlb)
> cmd: netperf -t TCP_RR -H <TargetHost> -l 60 -s 5
> 
> Mode        TPS-Before   TPS-After
> 
> 802.3ad   : 468,694      493,101
> TLB (lb=0): 392,583      392,965
> XOR       : 475,696      484,517
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...hat.com>

Applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html