[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5431F4E4.8000209@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2014 18:48:20 -0700
From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, jhs@...atatu.com,
eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: sched: cls_cgroup tear down exts and ematch from
rcu callback
On 10/05/2014 06:31 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
> Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 09:33:35 -0700
>
>> It is not RCU safe to destroy the action chain while there
>> is a possibility of readers accessing it. Move this code
>> into the rcu callback using the same rcu callback used in the
>> code patch to make a change to head.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>
> ...
>> @@ -156,10 +156,8 @@ static void cls_cgroup_destroy(struct tcf_proto *tp)
>> struct cls_cgroup_head *head = rtnl_dereference(tp->root);
>>
>> if (head) {
>> - tcf_exts_destroy(&head->exts);
>> - tcf_em_tree_destroy(head->net, &head->ematches);
>> RCU_INIT_POINTER(tp->root, NULL);
>> - kfree_rcu(head, rcu);
>> + call_rcu(&head->rcu, cls_cgroup_destroy_rcu);
>> }
>
> tcf_em_tree_destroy() takes head->tp as it's first argument in my
> net-next tree, maybe you need to respin this?
>
Yep, I'll respin this now sorry about that got a bit out of sync.
Thanks!
--
John Fastabend Intel Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists