| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20141007.151310.1935755900721864640.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 15:13:10 -0400 (EDT) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: herbert@...dor.apana.org.au Cc: fw@...len.de, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, bsd@...hat.com, stephen@...workplumber.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com, davidn@...idnewall.com Subject: Re: bridge: Save frag_max_size between PRE_ROUTING and POST_ROUTING From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2014 12:00:22 +0800 > bridge: Save frag_max_size between PRE_ROUTING and POST_ROUTING > > As we may defragment the packet in IPv4 PRE_ROUTING and refragment > it after POST_ROUTING we should save the value of frag_max_size. > > This is still very wrong as the bridge is supposed to leave the > packets intact, meaning that the right thing to do is to use the > original frag_list for fragmentation. > > Unfortunately we don't currently guarantee that the frag_list is > left untouched throughout netfilter so until this changes this is > the best we can do. > > There is also a spot in FORWARD where it appears that we can > forward a packet without going through fragmentation, mark it > so that we can fix it later. > > Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> Applied, thanks Herbert. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists