[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1412975447-29958-1-git-send-email-alex.aring@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 23:10:47 +0200
From: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel@...gutronix.de, Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH net] skbuff: fix ftrace handling in skb_unshare
If the skb is not dropped afterwards we should run consume_skb instead
kfree_skb. Inside of function skb_unshare we do always a kfree_skb,
doesn't depend if skb_copy failed or was successful.
This patch switch this behaviour like skb_share_check, if allocation of
sk_buff failed we use kfree_skb otherwise consume_skb.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com>
---
include/linux/skbuff.h | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
index abde271..d150734 100644
--- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
+++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
@@ -1116,7 +1116,12 @@ static inline struct sk_buff *skb_unshare(struct sk_buff *skb,
might_sleep_if(pri & __GFP_WAIT);
if (skb_cloned(skb)) {
struct sk_buff *nskb = skb_copy(skb, pri);
- kfree_skb(skb); /* Free our shared copy */
+
+ /* Free our shared copy */
+ if (likely(nskb))
+ consume_skb(skb);
+ else
+ kfree_skb(skb);
skb = nskb;
}
return skb;
--
2.1.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists