[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20141010.003628.646817757614430018.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 00:36:28 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: Raghuram.Kothakota@...cle.com
Cc: sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] sunvnet: Packet processing in
non-interrupt context.
From: Raghuram Kothakota <Raghuram.Kothakota@...cle.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 18:10:24 -0700
> Lock less Tx and Rx implementation is very nice, but requires to the
> code path to single threaded to achieve it.
I would like to know how you believe the Linux LLTX "lockless TX"
facility works.
It's not truly lockless, it just turns off the generic networking TX
path per-queue spinlock and puts the full burdon on the driver. It's
just moving the locking from one place to another, not eliminating it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists