[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <543B9F5A.8070909@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 11:46:02 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
To: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv6: notify userspace when we added or changed an ipv6
token
On 10/10/2014 04:08 PM, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> NetworkManager might want to know that it changed when the router advertisement
> arrives.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>
> Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
> ---
> net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> index 3e118df..3d11390 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> @@ -4528,6 +4528,7 @@ static int inet6_set_iftoken(struct inet6_dev *idev, struct in6_addr *token)
> }
>
> write_unlock_bh(&idev->lock);
> + netdev_state_change(dev);
I'm wondering why netdev_state_change()? You are probably
only after the netlink notification that is being invoked,
i.e. rtmsg_ifinfo(RTM_NEWLINK, ...), and don't strictly want
to call the device notifier chain.
Perhaps it might be better to define a new RTM_SETTOKEN, and
just call inet6_ifinfo_notify(RTM_SETTOKEN, idev) as this is
only idev specific anyway?
> addrconf_verify_rtnl();
> return 0;
> }
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists