netdev - Re: nf_reject_ipv4: module license 'unspecified' taints kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141014081234.GB5357@dhcp-16-198.nay.redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 14 Oct 2014 16:12:34 +0800
From:	"'Dave Young'" <dyoung@...hat.com>
To:	David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Cc:	"pablo@...filter.org" <pablo@...filter.org>,
	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: nf_reject_ipv4: module license 'unspecified' taints kernel

On 10/10/14 at 09:53am, David Laight wrote:
> From: Dave Young
> > With today's linus tree, I got below kmsg:
> > [   23.545204] nf_reject_ipv4: module license 'unspecified' taints kernel.
> > [   23.551886] Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint
> ...
> 
> Not 100% related, but why does loading a non-GPL module disable 
> lock debugging?
> (Is 'lock debugging' actually useful?)

I believe that we can not trust the debugging any more because kernel taint.. 

Thanks
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html