[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <543E5B19.2080200@parallels.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 15:31:37 +0400
From: Vasily Averin <vvs@...allels.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ipv4: dst_entry leak in ip_append_data()
On 15.10.2014 13:30, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-10-15 at 10:56 +0400, Vasily Averin wrote:
>> On 15.10.2014 08:46, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2014-10-14 at 08:57 +0400, Vasily Averin wrote:
>>>> v2: adjust the indentation of the arguments __ip_append_data() call
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 2e77d89b2fa8 ("net: avoid a pair of dst_hold()/dst_release() in ip_append_data()")
>>>>
>>>> If sk_write_queue is empty ip_append_data() executes ip_setup_cork()
>>>> that "steals" dst entry from rt to cork. Later it calls __ip_append_data()
>>>> that creates skb and adds it to sk_write_queue.
>>>>
>>>> If skb was added successfully following ip_push_pending_frames() call
>>>> reassign dst entries from cork to skb, and kfree_skb frees dst_entry.
>>>>
>>>> However nobody frees stolen dst_entry if skb was not added into sk_write_queue.
>>>
>>> I thought this was done by ip_flush_pending_frames() ?
>>
>> Take look at ip_send_unicast_reply():
>
> So maybe the bug is here ?
Thank you, I'll remake my patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists