[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <543FF408.3000808@solarflare.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 17:36:24 +0100
From: Robert Stonehouse <rstonehouse@...arflare.com>
To: Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <nikolay@...hat.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Shradha Shah <sshah@...arflare.com>,
Jon Cooper <jcooper@...arflare.com>,
linux-net-drivers <linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next] sfc: add support for skb->xmit_more
On 14/10/14 19:41, Edward Cree wrote:
> Don't ring the doorbell, and don't do PIO. This will also prevent
> TX Push, because there will be more than one buffer waiting when
> the doorbell is rung.
>
> Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>
> ---
>
> @@ -351,8 +343,6 @@ netdev_tx_t efx_enqueue_skb(struct efx_tx_queue *tx_queue, struct sk_buff *skb)
> unsigned short dma_flags;
> int i = 0;
>
> - EFX_BUG_ON_PARANOID(tx_queue->write_count != tx_queue->insert_count);
> -
> if (skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_size)
> return efx_enqueue_skb_tso(tx_queue, skb);
Would it be possible to keep a weaker version of this check i.e.
EFX_BUG_ON_PARANOID(tx_queue->write_count > tx_queue->insert_count);
> @@ -1258,14 +1249,13 @@ static int efx_enqueue_skb_tso(struct efx_tx_queue *tx_queue,
> struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> struct efx_nic *efx = tx_queue->efx;
> + unsigned int old_insert_count = tx_queue->insert_count;
> int frag_i, rc;
> struct tso_state state;
>
> /* Find the packet protocol and sanity-check it */
> state.protocol = efx_tso_check_protocol(skb);
>
> - EFX_BUG_ON_PARANOID(tx_queue->write_count != tx_queue->insert_count);
> -
> rc = tso_start(&state, efx, skb);
> if (rc)
> goto mem_err;
The same would apply here.
Thanks
Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists