[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1413571980.25949.9.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 11:53:00 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...hat.com>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
"Jiafei.Pan@...escale.com" <Jiafei.Pan@...escale.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"jkosina@...e.cz" <jkosina@...e.cz>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"LeoLi@...escale.com" <LeoLi@...escale.com>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: use hardware buffer pool to allocate skb
On Fri, 2014-10-17 at 11:28 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> Yes, I am well aware of this bit. That is my concern. You increase the
> size for truesize, it will cut the amount of queueing in half, and then
> igb will start seeing drops when it has to deal with bursty traffic and
> people will start to complain about a performance regression. That is
> the bit I want to avoid.
Then, what about addressing the issue for good, instead of working
around it ?
Don't worry, I will work on it.
We also are working on a direct placement in memory for TCP receive
path. (equivalent of sendfile() but for receiver), to avoid the need to
hold payload in kernel memory (out of order queues)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists