[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1414005158.9031.22.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 12:12:38 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Crestez Dan Leonard <cdleonard@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] tcp md5 use of alloc_percpu
On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 21:55 +0300, Crestez Dan Leonard wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It seems that the TCP MD5 feature allocates a percpu struct
> tcp_md5sig_pool and uses part of that memory for a scratch buffer to
> do crypto on. Here is the relevant code:
>
> static int tcp_v4_md5_hash_pseudoheader(struct tcp_md5sig_pool *hp,
> __be32 daddr, __be32 saddr,
> int nbytes)
> {
> struct tcp4_pseudohdr *bp;
> struct scatterlist sg;
>
> bp = &hp->md5_blk.ip4;
>
> /*
> * 1. the TCP pseudo-header (in the order: source IP address,
> * destination IP address, zero-padded protocol number, and
> * segment length)
> */
> bp->saddr = saddr;
> bp->daddr = daddr;
> bp->pad = 0;
> bp->protocol = IPPROTO_TCP;
> bp->len = cpu_to_be16(nbytes);
>
> sg_init_one(&sg, bp, sizeof(*bp));
> return crypto_hash_update(&hp->md5_desc, &sg, sizeof(*bp));
> }
>
> sg_init_one does virt_addr on the pointer which assumes it is directly
> accessible. But the tcp_md5sig_pool pointer comes from alloc_percpu
> which can return memory from the vmalloc area after the
> pcpu_first_chunk is exhausted. This looks wrong to me. I'm am getting
> crashes on mips and I believe this to be the cause.
Then just remove the alloc_percpu() from __tcp_alloc_md5sig_pool() and
make this a static per cpu definition (not a dynamic allocation)
>
> Allocating a scratch buffer this way is very peculiar. The
> tcp4_pseudohdr struct is only 12 bytes in length. Similar code in
> tcp_v6_md5_hash_pseudoheader uses a 40 byte tcp6_pseudohdr. I think it
> is perfectly reasonable to allocate this kind of stuff on the stack,
> right? These pseudohdr structs are not used at all outside these two
> static functions and it would simplify the code.
>
Yep, but the sg stuff does not allow for stack variables. Because of
possible offloading and DMA, I dont know...
> The whole notion of struct tcp_md5sig_pool seems dubious. This is a
> very tiny struct already and after removing the pseudohdr it shrinks
> to a percpu hash_desc for md5 (8 or 16 bytes). Wouldn't DEFINE_PERCPU
> be more appropriate?
Sure. this would be the more appropriate fix IMO.
> Before commit 71cea17ed39fdf1c0634f530ddc6a2c2fc601c2b the struct
> tcp_md5sig_pool structs were freed when all users were gone, but that
> functionality seems to have been dropped.
>
> I'm not familiar with the linux crypto API. Isn't there an easier way
> to get a temporary md5 hasher?
You should CC crypto guys maybe ...
>
> Here's what I mean by allocating tcp{4,6}_pseudohdr on the stack:
Your patch is quite invasive, you should so something simpler to ease
backports.
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists