[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141022221245.GE17252@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 18:12:45 -0400
From: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net, sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCHv5 3/4] sparc64: Avoid irqsave/restore on vio.lock if
in_softirq()
For NAPIfied drivers , there is no need to
synchronize by doing irqsave/restore on vio.lock in the I/O
path.
Signed-off-by: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
---
arch/sparc/kernel/viohs.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/viohs.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/viohs.c
index 526fcb5..92e2a32 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/viohs.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/viohs.c
@@ -747,10 +747,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(vio_ldc_free);
void vio_port_up(struct vio_driver_state *vio)
{
- unsigned long flags;
+ unsigned long flags = 0;
int err, state;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&vio->lock, flags);
+ if (!in_softirq())
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&vio->lock, flags);
state = ldc_state(vio->lp);
@@ -777,7 +778,8 @@ void vio_port_up(struct vio_driver_state *vio)
mod_timer(&vio->timer, expires);
}
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vio->lock, flags);
+ if (!in_softirq())
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vio->lock, flags);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(vio_port_up);
--
1.8.4.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists