[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141023133203.GA25190@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 15:32:03 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, alexander.h.duyck@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: dsa: Error out on tagging protocol mismatches
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 04:46:52PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 10/22/2014 04:35 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > If there is a mismatch between enabled tagging protocols and the
> > protocol the switch supports, error out, rather than continue with a
> > situation which is unlikely to work.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> > cc: alexander.h.duyck@...el.com
> > ---
> > net/dsa/dsa.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/dsa/dsa.c b/net/dsa/dsa.c
> > index 22f34cf4cb27..8a31bd81a315 100644
> > --- a/net/dsa/dsa.c
> > +++ b/net/dsa/dsa.c
> > @@ -175,7 +175,8 @@ dsa_switch_setup(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst, int index,
> > break;
> > #endif
> > default:
> > - break;
> > + ret = -ENOPROTOOPT;
> > + goto out;
> > }
>
> This prevents using a switch driver without tagging, which is something
> that you might want to do (link setup, ethtool stats, EEE etc...).
Hi Florian
I didn't know that was a use case.
So i assume such a driver would use DSA_TAG_PROTO_NONE? So all i need
to do is add that as a case value to the switch statement, and we
should cover that use case, and still be able to detect a mismatch.
v2 patch soon.
Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists