netdev - Re: [Patch net 1/2] sch_pie: schedule the timer after all init succeed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1414197563.20845.50.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:	Fri, 24 Oct 2014 17:39:23 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
Cc:	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Vijay Subramanian <vijaynsu@...co.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch net 1/2] sch_pie: schedule the timer after all init
 succeed

On Fri, 2014-10-24 at 17:28 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Not sure why you use "Cc: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>",
> > given that all networking patches have "Signed-off-by: David S. Miller
> > <davem@...emloft.net>" ???
> >
> 
> I don't understand what you are talking about:
> 
> If you are suggesting DaveM is too obvious to Cc, well, Cc'ing him
> doesn't harm anything. I know he is on netdev list, but just in case
> vger.kernel.org is broken or etc...
> 
> If you are suggesting to Cc his another email address, please update
> MAINTAINERS.


You send the patch to David Miller, as a recipient, so that he can read
it, and apply it.

You don't need to add one line in the changelog.

Why would it be needed ? Think about it.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html