[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141025010359.GD11289@acer.localdomain>
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 02:04:00 +0100
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Wang Bo <wang.bo116@....com.cn>,
John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Terry Lam <vtlam@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch net 2/2] net_sched: always call ->destroy when ->init()
fails
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 05:53:33PM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net> wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 05:38:48PM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> >> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Again, the correct fix is to make qdisc_create_dflt() not call
> >> > qdisc_destroy() but clean up the qdisc manually as done in
> >> > qdisc_create().
> >>
> >> I kindly wish you a good luck with fixing all callers of qdisc_create_dflt().
> >> Go ahead. :)
> >
> > Here you go:
> >
>
> ...
>
> Did you check all ->init() call ->destroy() on failure? Look at the
> sch_pie I have fixed in 1/2.
Why should they? They need to clean up internally, how they do it is
entirely up to them.
> Also check those xxx_init() calling xxx_change().
Please point to conrete bugs if you have any doubts. Real ones, not things
like qdisc_watchdog_init(). This is how the API to which the qdiscs have
been written has always worked.
And yes, I did check the qdisc error paths many times in the past.
> Really, we don't have to make all ->init() doing cleanup by itself.
Are you seriously suggesting that it would be better to have ->destroy()
check what parts were actually initialized and what needs to be cleaned
up instead of assuming a consistent state and have the only function that
actually knows the current state on error (->init()) do its own cleanup?
That's not even worth arguing about, its utterly and completely wrong.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists