[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141028072040.GA6825@marquez.int.rhx>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 08:20:40 +0100
From: Michele Baldessari <michele@...syn.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, vyasevich@...il.com,
nhorman@...driver.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, dborkman@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [net 1/2] sctp: add transport state in /proc/net/sctp/remaddr
Hi David,
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 06:55:45PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Michele Baldessari <michele@...syn.org>
> Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 21:48:40 +0200
>
> > It is often quite helpful to be able to know the state of a transport
> > outside of the application itself (for troubleshooting purposes or for
> > monitoring purposes). Add it under /proc/net/sctp/remaddr.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michele Baldessari <michele@...syn.org>
>
> You can't change the layout of procfs files, applications parse
> these files and any modification can potentially break such tools.
Thanks for the review. I assumed that extending a procfile by adding
a column at the end is ok and that tools must cope with that anyway.
(i.e. like it's been done in f19c29e3e391a66a273e9afebaf01917245148cd)
> Secondly, even if this change were acceptable, targetting this
> change at anything other than the net-next tree is not appropriate
> because it is a new feature.
Ok. Unless you are against adding a column, I'll resubmit to net-next
later this week.
Thanks,
Michele
--
Michele Baldessari <michele@...syn.org>
C2A5 9DA3 9961 4FFB E01B D0BC DDD4 DCCB 7515 5C6D
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists