[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQKvfay7zC-kNGXz7uAjVrhqL80xQ=zvmAsSz4pNhD=9NQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 13:32:44 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Matt Evans <matt@...abs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PPC: bpf_jit_comp: add SKF_AD_PKTTYPE instruction
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org> wrote:
> Add BPF extension SKF_AD_PKTTYPE to ppc JIT to load
> skb->pkt_type field.
>
> Before:
> [ 88.262622] test_bpf: #11 LD_IND_NET 86 97 99 PASS
> [ 88.265740] test_bpf: #12 LD_PKTTYPE 109 107 PASS
>
> After:
> [ 80.605964] test_bpf: #11 LD_IND_NET 44 40 39 PASS
> [ 80.607370] test_bpf: #12 LD_PKTTYPE 9 9 PASS
if you'd only quoted #12, it would all make sense ;)
but #11 test is not using PKTTYPE. So your patch shouldn't
make a difference. Are these numbers with JIT on and off?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists