netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 5/8] net/mlx4_en: Remove redundant code from RX/GRO path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 31 Oct 2014 01:25:34 +0200
From:	Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Matan Barak <matanb@...lanox.com>,
	Amir Vadai <amirv@...lanox.com>,
	Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
	Shani Michaeli <shanim@...lanox.com>,
	Ido Shamay <idos@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/8] net/mlx4_en: Remove redundant code from
 RX/GRO path

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 18:06 +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>> Remove the code which goes through napi_gro_frags() on the RX path,
>> use only napi_gro_receive().

> Hmpff... napi_gro_frags() should be faster.
> Have you benchmarked this ?


yep we did, napi_gro_frags() was somehow better for single stream. Do
you think we need to do it the other way around, e.g converge to use
napi_gro_frags()?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html