[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141030102622.GD24783@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 06:26:22 -0400
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
To: Michele Baldessari <michele@...syn.org>
Cc: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [net-next 2/2] sctp: replace seq_printf with seq_puts
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:29:16AM +0100, Michele Baldessari wrote:
> Fixes checkpatch warning:
> "WARNING: Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf"
>
> Signed-off-by: Michele Baldessari <michele@...syn.org>
> ---
> net/sctp/proc.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/proc.c b/net/sctp/proc.c
> index bfb242af06ab..0697eda5aed8 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/proc.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/proc.c
> @@ -490,14 +490,14 @@ static int sctp_remaddr_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
> * Note: We don't have a way to tally this at the moment
> * so lets just leave it as zero for the moment
> */
> - seq_printf(seq, "0 ");
> + seq_puts(seq, "0 ");
>
> /*
> * remote address start time (START). This is also not
> * currently implemented, but we can record it with a
> * jiffies marker in a subsequent patch
> */
> - seq_printf(seq, "0 ");
> + seq_puts(seq, "0 ");
>
> /*
> * The current state of this destination. I.e.
> --
> 2.1.0
>
>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists