netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: lustre: lnet: lnet: do not initialise statics to 0 or NULL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141031205024.GB20417@kroah.com>
Date:	Fri, 31 Oct 2014 13:50:24 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Balavasu <kp.balavasu@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	andreas.dilger@...el.com, oleg.drokin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: lustre: lnet: lnet: do not initialise
 statics to 0 or NULL

On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 11:48:08PM +0530, Balavasu wrote:
> This patch fixes the checkpatch.pl issue
> Error: do not initialise statics to 0 or NULL for time
> 
> Signed-off-by: Balavasu <kp.balavasu@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/do not instalise 0 | 10 +++++-----

That line doesn't look right, does it?

And why netdev and not the mailing list for the drivers/staging/ tree?

And again, I need a full name.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html