lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 31 Oct 2014 10:41:24 +0100
From:	Nicolas Dichtel <>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 1/4] netns: add genl cmd to add and get peer
 netns ids

Le 30/10/2014 19:35, Eric W. Biederman a écrit :
> Nicolas Dichtel <> writes:
>> With this patch, a user can define an id for a peer netns by providing a FD or a
>> PID. These ids are local to netns (ie valid only into one netns).
> Scratches head.  Do you actually find value in using the pid instead of
> a file descriptor?
I copied the mechanism from rtnl_link_get_net():
First check if the user provides a PID, if not, check for a FD.

> Doing things by pid was an early attempt to make things work, and has
> been a bit clutsy.  If you don't find value in it I would recommend just
> supporting getting/setting the network namespace by file descriptor.
Hmm, if I understand well, it's what is done in the patch:

>> +static int netns_nl_cmd_newid(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
>> +{
>> +	if (info->attrs[NETNSA_PID])
>> +		peer = get_net_ns_by_pid(nla_get_u32(info->attrs[NETNSA_PID]));
>> +	else if (info->attrs[NETNSA_FD])
>> +		peer = get_net_ns_by_fd(nla_get_u32(info->attrs[NETNSA_FD]));
>> +	else
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +	if (IS_ERR(peer))
>> +		return PTR_ERR(peer);

Am I right?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists