[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOJe8K31iB9+7c1BnS=6DdriU08WUisM7sYgj8nOBo4Fg=XUBg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2014 20:19:09 +0400
From: Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org>
To: Denis Kirjanov <kirjanov@...il.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Matt Evans <matt@...abs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PPC: bpf_jit_comp: add SKF_AD_PKTTYPE instruction
ping
On 10/31/14, Denis Kirjanov <kirjanov@...il.com> wrote:
> On 10/30/14, Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org>
>> wrote:
>>> Add BPF extension SKF_AD_PKTTYPE to ppc JIT to load
>>> skb->pkt_type field.
>>>
>>> Before:
>>> [ 88.262622] test_bpf: #11 LD_IND_NET 86 97 99 PASS
>>> [ 88.265740] test_bpf: #12 LD_PKTTYPE 109 107 PASS
>>>
>>> After:
>>> [ 80.605964] test_bpf: #11 LD_IND_NET 44 40 39 PASS
>>> [ 80.607370] test_bpf: #12 LD_PKTTYPE 9 9 PASS
>>
>> if you'd only quoted #12, it would all make sense ;)
>> but #11 test is not using PKTTYPE. So your patch shouldn't
>> make a difference. Are these numbers with JIT on and off?
>
> Right.
>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Denis
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists