[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54552F0E.70407@free-electrons.com>
Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2014 16:05:50 -0300
From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik@...vell.com>,
Lior Amsalem <alior@...vell.com>,
Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] mv643xx_eth: Disable TSO by default
On 11/01/2014 02:37 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-11-01 at 10:26 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> On Sat, 2014-11-01 at 12:30 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
>>> Several users ([1], [2]) have been reporting data corruption with TSO on
>>> Kirkwood platforms (i.e. using the mv643xx_eth driver).
>>>
>>> Until we manage to find what's causing this, this simple patch will make
>>> the TSO path disabled by default. This patch should be queued for stable,
>>> fixing the TSO feature introduced in v3.16.
>>>
>>> The corruption itself is very easy to reproduce: checking md5sum on a mounted
>>> NFS directory gives a different result each time. Same tests using the mvneta
>>> driver (Armada 370/38x/XP SoC) pass with no issues.
>>>
>>> Frankly, I'm a bit puzzled about this, and so any ideas or debugging hints
>>> are well received.
>>
>> lack of barriers maybe ?
>>
Yup, that was my initial thought as well...
>> It seems you might need to populate all TX descriptors but delay the
>> first, like doing the populate in descending order.
>>
>> If you take a look at txq_submit_skb(), you'll see the final
>> desc->cmd_sts = cmd_sts (line 959) is done _after_ frags were cooked by
>> txq_submit_frag_skb()
>>
>> You should kick the nick only when all TX descriptors are ready and
>> committed to memory.
>>
>
> Untested patch would be :
>
Yeah, it makes sense. I'm still seeing the corruption after applying
your patch.
However, maybe we are onto something. I'll see about taking a closer
look and give this some more thought.
Thanks for the hint!
--
Ezequiel GarcĂa, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists