lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 3 Nov 2014 12:35:29 +0000
From:	Hayes Wang <>
To:	Francois Romieu <>
CC:	David Miller <>,
	"" <>,
	nic_swsd <>,
	"" <>,
	"" <>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] r8152: clear theflagofSCHEDULE_TASKLETin tasklet

 Francois Romieu [] 
> test_and_clear_bit (dense) or clear_bit would be more idiomatic.

Excuse me. If I use clear_bit without test_bit or test_and_clear_bit,
they alwayes call the spin lock. However, for my original flow, the spin
lock is only called when the clear_bit is necessary. Is that better?
Best Regards,
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists